harringtons 3rd book, how did u score?

[mort159]

just wondering how other people scored on the work book.

[FeNeF]

IMO a lot of the quizzes are rather suspect, and at least 2 are clearly and undeniably wrong.

[sykotic]

I scored a 480. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[mort159]

i scored 429, skotic are u a consistent winner in tournaments.

[kolotoure]

Some of this book is just plain retarded

[Reef]

ugh, I just ordered it [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[FW Andy]

406

I lost quite a few points trying to correct a situation that I wouldn't have even been in a few questions. Even when my initial answer may have been correct (like a fold) and rcvd equal points but he decided to send the example the alt way.

[waterhoose]

394

[2+LOU]

I scored 365.

I think Dan's books are great. But when people disagree with some of it, it's because they won't play it the conservative way, such as he does. He clearly states in all three books that there are many ways to approch his problems, but this is his way, in his book.

Great series of books!

I scored a 376. Actually I believe I should have maybe 10 more points on that because it was very unclear how to answer a few of the questions...some you had to answer the way Harrington teaches and some he scored based on the way the player you are plays. but the difference would not matter anyway. I do believe that, of the at least 2 dozen books I have read, Harringtons are the absolute best and have helped my game the most.