Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha/8
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2007, 02:51 PM
normalcy normalcy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23
Default bankroll question

assume that i am a marginally winning player at the 1/2 level in LIMIT O8 and that i am multi-tabling full ring games...

what is the recommended bankroll for this. i have heard that it is around 300 big bets for LIMIT holdem, but is it lower for LIMIT O8??

thx
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2007, 05:46 PM
Truthiness24 Truthiness24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Monica
Posts: 417
Default Re: bankroll question

I've read that you can get by on 100 big bets in a limit split pot game, but some risk of ruin would have to come with that.

I think Brian Townsend said that you should have 20 buyins for any nl or pl game that you play, and 10 buyins for any limit game. I usually buy in to a limit game for 20 BB, so that would mean that you would need 200 BBs. So long as you have the discipline to drop down, this seems like enough to me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2007, 12:32 AM
yukoncpa yukoncpa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: kinky sex dude in the inferno
Posts: 1,449
Default Re: bankroll question

Mason Malmuth suggested on page 64 of Poker Essays that if you are an ok player playing low LIMIT o/8 that you need 100x the big bet. However, if you are talking about internet play, then I can assure you, you need a bigger bankroll then that if you are a marginal winner. The reason is because a typical low limit game on the internet will be raised preflop approximately half the time and only 2-4 players on average will go to showdown. Just 4 years ago, in a typical California brick and mortar game, you might be able to expect 6,7, or 8 people to constantly see a showdown with very much passive play from pillar to post. This is not the case even with low limit games today on the internet. I’d say that now days you had better be a bit better than a marginally winning player in order to figure out bankroll requirements. Otherwise, the games are so aggressive (not just preflop, but on every street), that bankroll requirements can go through the roof.

I’ll say that for limit o/8 on the internet, if you are a somewhat small but consistently winning player, then you need 300 times the big bet plus a good percentage of rake back to be an adequate bankroll.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2007, 05:34 AM
silver book silver book is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 608
Default Re: bankroll question

[ QUOTE ]


I think Brian Townsend said that you should have 20 buyins for any nl or pl game that you play, and 10 buyins for any limit game.

[/ QUOTE ]

What is considered a buy-in in limit?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2007, 08:07 AM
normalcy normalcy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23
Default Re: bankroll question

thank you for the replies
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2007, 03:25 PM
Truthiness24 Truthiness24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Monica
Posts: 417
Default Re: bankroll question

I think that he meant 20 BBs as a buyin for a limit game. If you think that you need 25 or 30 (or more), then adjust your math accordingly.

I've been using this principle successfully. (So far.)

And so far as I know, Brian isn't a shortstacking ratholer, so when he says 20 buyins in NL I think he means 20x the max buyin, or 20x what you budget to buy in.

I agree that you would need a bigger roll online. The games just play bigger and tougher, and there's more risk of ruin.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.