#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kings facing turn raise
Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)
SB: $20.95 BB: $24.25 UTG: $58.05 hero (MP): $76.30 CO: $52.25 BTN: $46.00 Reads: <font color="blue">I am 22/17/2.5 after 100 or so hands I have no stats at the time as the HUD wasn't showing them. I can't remember anything of note from him/her</font> Preflop: hero is dealt K K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (6 Players) UTG calls $0.50, <font color="red">hero raises to $2.00</font>, 3 folds, BB calls $1.50, UTG calls $1.50 Flop: ($6.25) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4 (3 Players) BB checks, UTG checks, <font color="red">hero bets $4.50</font>, BB folds, UTG calls $4.50 Turn: ($15.25) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4 7 (2 Players) UTG checks, <font color="red">hero bets $10.00</font>, <font color="red">UTG raises to $34.50</font> Pot Size: $59.75 Thoughts? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Kings facing turn raise
Read The Baluga theorem.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Kings facing turn raise
[ QUOTE ]
Read The Baluga theorem. [/ QUOTE ] I know what it is. Do you just blindly follow a somewhat popular "theorem" without question? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Kings facing turn raise
Nah, [censored] blindly following the theorem. But I think it does apply here, and I think because villain is an unknown we take the 0EV play here instead of one that to me looks -EV (calling).
Instead, consider what hands villain could possibly be making this play with. Only possible hand he could do this with that you are beating (aside from total air, which would be a ballsy bluff considering your continued strength on the above board) here is AQ, and I think that makes up a pretty small portion of his range. Sure looks like a set of 3's or 4's to me. If villain is bad/loose even 56. I fold. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Kings facing turn raise
like... i doubt hes sophisticated enough to make this on a semibluff so his range here is like AQ-56-sets.. so what the answer should be pretty clear.
|
|
|