#1
|
|||
|
|||
11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
Whats my play here?
No-Limit Hold'em Tournament ($11), Blinds 50/100 <font color="blue">(5 handed)</font> Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.7 by www.pokerstrategy.cc. Seat 2: y0d4x ( 1,610 ) Seat 4: xxx13ysz ( 5,670 ) Seat 3: someone04275 ( 1,890 ) Seat 6: mjwarnock ( 4,660 ) Seat 8: KingBuzzo888 ( 6,170 ) Preflop: Hero is CO with 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] MP3 calls $100.00, <font color="grey">Hero folds</font>, <font color="red">BU raises to 450</font>, <font color="grey">3 folds</font>. Final Pot: 700 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
I would probably have played weak, and limped, then folded to the reraise. That sounds like a bad move now that I type it, but I certainly wouldn't push, and I wouldn't raise.
Calling first option, folding second option. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
U have 57 bb right?
With this stack size and two really big stacks behind I like a limp or set value,100 doesnt really heart your stack too much. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
no, i am y0d4x, i got 16bb here..
yeah, i think you could limp for a set here still but it would hurt cuz they just raise so freakin often even with mediocre hands and you dont have the odds to call then |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 11$ - Party - 55 shorthanded
No 16 BB at PP 11s isnt enough to limp for set value.This is a
fold because the players u behind will see the two limps as red meat. |
|
|