#1
|
|||
|
|||
88 NL100 step by step
UTG has similar stats as I do (24/19) through 100 hands, but is fishy and weird (notice he's posting UTG.) In an earlier hand he called my UTG raise with J5s and floated a 3-way AK6r flop. Other villain is 18/15 over about 80 hands and seems okay. We haven't tangled and I don't know how he got his stack. I got mine by sucking out on a semi-bluff in a 3-bet pot.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) SB ($108.95) BB ($137.15) UTG ($101.50) MP ($382.35) CO ($196.35) Hero ($171.65) Preflop: Hero is Button with 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. UTG posts a blind of $1.50. <font color="#CC3333">UTG (poster) raises to $6</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $6, Hero calls $6, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>. Flop: ($20) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $17</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $45</font> Hero? (I assume PF is standard, but chime if not...) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
I would call because I want UTG to get frisky and any raise you make is gonna be awkward because of your deepish stacks. I think calling and hoping UTG shoves light is the best option.
PF seems fine. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
shove
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
[ QUOTE ]
I would call because I want UTG to get frisky and any raise you make is gonna be awkward because of your deepish stacks. I think calling and hoping UTG shoves light is the best option. PF seems fine. [/ QUOTE ] Overcalling here looks way more suspect than shoving.... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
[ QUOTE ]
shove [/ QUOTE ] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
shove this and hope an overpair calls.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
In game, I shove here 100% of the time because of the board texture. I mean there are 11 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3 Jacks, 3 Nines, 3 Sixes, 3 Fours that I don't want to see on the turn. Which is 23 of the 47 possible turn cards. Calling will correctly price these draws in, so I shove for value/hand protection.
In theory, overcalling is so sexy. In a perfect world you call, UTG shoves, CO insta-shoves, and you type, "ship it" in the chat. Sounds so good. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
Okay looks like the consensus is all-in. In retrospect, I agree. In the moment though, I got greedy...
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) SB ($108.95) BB ($137.15) UTG ($101.50) MP ($382.35) CO ($196.35) Hero ($171.65) Preflop: Hero is Button with 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. UTG posts a blind of $1.50. <font color="#CC3333">UTG (poster) raises to $6</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $6, Hero calls $6, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>. Flop: ($20) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets $17</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $45</font>, Hero calls $45, UTG folds. Turn: ($127) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> CO checks Hero? ($120 effective remaining stacks) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
$50 or something else enticing
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 NL100 step by step
all in on flop.
all in on turn. |
|
|