Skill level: FTP vs Stars

[MuckMnDripM]

I play most of my plo on FTP. Ive never played on stars.

1.Is the skill level (15-25, 25-50 and 50-1) better at FTP than stars.

2.If you had to choose between FTP and Stars which site would you take. Include things like sign up bonus, rakeback, software and skill level.

[chucky]

Try search function. The forum has covered this many times.

[Troll_Inc]

[ QUOTE ]
I play most of my plo on FTP. Ive never played on stars.

1.Is the skill level (15-25, 25-50 and 50-1) better at FTP than stars.

2.If you had to choose between FTP and Stars which site would you take. Include things like sign up bonus, rakeback, software and skill level.

[/ QUOTE ]

Play the site that won't give your opponents quads when you flop top full house or an ace on the river to out-set you when all the money went in on the flop, or not pay you off when you miraculously occasionally actually hit a flop. That's the site you want to play.

[MuckMnDripM]

I did that with out succes.

[chucky]

Stars does not do rakeback to the best of my knowledge.

[PLOlover]

limited sample but best to worst,

UB>PS>FT

[rine]

[ QUOTE ]
limited sample but best to worst,

UB>PS>FT

[/ QUOTE ]
hand histories + more than one table > UB?

[Rob121]

bodog=easiest
ive had people go broke against me at 200max for 100bb holding qqxx with the board being something like Ax5h6h7x2jh

[PLOlover]

[ QUOTE ]
Quote:
limited sample but best to worst,

UB>PS>FT


hand histories + more than one table > UB?

[/ QUOTE ]

true, UB has limited tables, still player vs. player I think UB has loosest worst players. also hand histories you can prefetch so youcan sit down and get the last 100 or so.

also yeah bodog was really bad but I haven't played there in a while and I'm not sure I'd recommend putting money on there right now but what do I know.