|
|
#1
06-13-2007, 01:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Pokerstars vs other websites Pros Cons
Currently I play only on Stars, mainly NL$1BB or $2BB.
Pros- Lots of players, lots of games, and lots of tournaments. Cons- No rakeback, nitfest of multitablers, and not too many fish. I used to play on Absolute poker and the games were definatly weaker, yet they don't have much traffic in the cash games any more. Please give me some feedback on some good websites with traffic and weak players. Specifically FTP and UB would be nice. If you would like more detailed explaination of PS just let me know. Thanks 
|
|
#2
06-13-2007, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars vs other websites Pros Cons
[ QUOTE ]
Cons- No rakeback, [/ QUOTE ] This isn't entirely true - if you play a lot, effective RB is pretty significant (the $1500 bonii for 100k FPPS are nice, not to mention the stepping bonuses)
|
|
#3
06-13-2007, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars vs other websites Pros Cons
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Cons- No rakeback, [/ QUOTE ] This isn't entirely true - if you play a lot, effective RB is pretty significant (the $1500 bonii for 100k FPPS are nice, not to mention the stepping bonuses) [/ QUOTE ] True but it is much less than 30% rakeback that many other sites are offering
|
|
#4
06-13-2007, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars vs other websites Pros Cons
If you're supernova it's right at 30% for NL100.
Add to that it's the only site I trust and it's not a difficult choice.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
