|
|
#1
08-08-2006, 11:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
The Sklansky v Small, Militarily Trained Children Proposition
After watching Hostel, my stoned brother/roommate keeps wanting to fight with me, so I made the proposition to see how many small children he could collapse before they got the group got the best of him.
In the movie, the children had aerial support, and my brother (who is far less intellectually superior) asked about the method of entry for the children. The specifics of the original challenge slip my mind, but I propose the age of 8, with the general training level of "military." I categorize them similar to the children in Hostel. I'm speaking to someone who often overestimates himself, so he proposes that he can defeat the group of children in Hostel. I am not sure that any one man could defeat that group alone. If so, who? 
|
|
#2
08-08-2006, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Sklansky v Small, Militarily Trained Children Proposition
I really get the fealing you're still stoned. I don't remember how many children were in the gang in hostel, but from what I remember I dont think anybody could take them by themself due to their willingness to use weapons, and the fact that there's at least 10 of them.
Edit: I'm sure there's people with enough training to do it, but a normal person doesn't stand a chance.
|
|
#4
08-08-2006, 11:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Sklansky v Small, Militarily Trained Children Proposition
well, even if I got ahold of a pipe, I'd still be getting hit by a crapload of stones to the face, so I dont think i'd win still. Give me a pipe, and they have no stones, then we're talking though.
|
|
#6
08-09-2006, 12:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Sklansky v Small, Militarily Trained Children Proposition
Those dumb henchmen in the movie should have gotten back in the car and ran those brats over. End of challenge. Actually they shouldn't have gotten out of the car in the first place, but then the hero would've been caught and the plot would have fallen apart.
|
|
#7
08-09-2006, 12:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Sklansky v Small, Militarily Trained Children Proposition
[ QUOTE ]
well, even if I got ahold of a pipe, I'd still be getting hit by a crapload of stones to the face, so I dont think i'd win still. Give me a pipe, and they have no stones, then we're talking though. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. Everybody empty-handed >> Everybody has a pipe. -Sam
|
|
#8
08-09-2006, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Sklansky v Small, Militarily Trained Children Proposition
8 year old kids? I've been hit in the head with a baseball thrown by 8 year old kids. It hurts, but not incapacitating. One swing of the pipe, one less kid. Kids don't stand a chance.
|
|
#9
08-09-2006, 06:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Sklansky v Small, Militarily Trained Children Proposition
For some reason I thought the title was ""The Sklansk v Small, Militarily Trained Chicken Proposition" but I guess this is interesting too.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
