|
|
#1
11-11-2006, 10:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
do ppl not post 200 NL hands? or is it not much diff from 100NL?
full-ring, that is.
thanks in advance for any replies. also, is there a former limit players support group? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] 
|
|
#2
11-11-2006, 10:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: do ppl not post 200 NL hands? or is it not much diff from 100NL?
This post makes 0<x<very small sense.
|
|
#3
11-11-2006, 10:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: do ppl not post 200 NL hands? or is it not much diff from 100NL?
To try to answer what I think you're asking is, a lot of people don't post full ring hands because most of the people here play 6-max. Also 6-max hands tend to be more marginal whereas full ring hands are easier (basic wait for sets and double up type hands) and thus 6-max hands are better suited for deeper analysis. No former limit player support group.
|
|
#4
11-11-2006, 11:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: do ppl not post 200 NL hands? or is it not much diff from 100NL?
Yop and yop ... I play a ton of full ring and I started at 25NL and I'm at 200NL with shots at juicy 400NL games. Get in touch if you want to talk about nit world.
|
|
#6
11-12-2006, 12:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: do ppl not post 200 NL hands? or is it not much diff from 100NL?
There is the occasional 200FR post but they are fairly rare. Most of the 6max posts are applicable to FR anyway. Us former limidonks don't have a support group but we should.
There are a few decent posts on the transition from limit to no-limit so a search might be helpful.
|
|
#7
11-12-2006, 12:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: do ppl not post 200 NL hands? or is it not much diff from 100NL?
The wider ranges in 6-max make it a different animal. Also fewer idiots there so psychological factors don't matter as much.
Anyway OP, post a few hands. I did when I played 200FR and usually got some response.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
