Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2006, 05:18 PM
rageotones rageotones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: panhandlin\'
Posts: 1,484
Default Which is the better structure?

120 BB's at 60-min levels or
200 BB's at 45-min levels

both live, same blind levels.
i'm trying to figure out which one will have more play and be less of a pushfest around bubble time.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2006, 05:39 PM
AceLuby AceLuby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rockin my new guitar instead of playing poker
Posts: 3,769
Default Re: Which is the better structure?

They both have deep stacked structures, so they are both good IMO. I couldn't tell you which is 'better' though.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2006, 06:04 PM
Bullet_Dodger Bullet_Dodger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: puttin things into perspective
Posts: 1,790
Default Re: Which is the better structure?

I would prefer the 2nd structure. Deep stacked to start with means an advantage for any solid player. The blinds changing sooner just means that you are going to have to switch gears sooner, which I dont have a problem with.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2006, 06:17 PM
1st and 15 1st and 15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Legacy Cemented.
Posts: 307
Default Re: Which is the better structure?

I also think the second is a better choice. I'll easily take the starting stack that is 75% bigger at the start of the tourny in lieu of longer level times later on.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.