Far more suitable for rakeback forum.... oh well

[Acemanhattan]

thoughts on whats better: assuming I play about 2K hands a day between 1-2nl and 2-4nl and am about 10k points away from supernova on pokerstars would it be better to
A: stay on stars and cashout the 1500 vip bonus
B: deposit on full tilt and take the rakeback

(note) ive already made a cash deposit on ft before and would have to be tricky about setting my account up again.

rakeback forum i know, but no one responds there.

[ebarnet]

nova rakeback is over 25% if u just take the 1500$ bonuses- add in all the sweet freerolls and deposit bonuses(which FT doesn't give u when u have rakeback) and stars is better IMO. But.... if u can beat FT for 1BB/100 more then that's probably the way to go.

[Acemanhattan]

thanks man, thats kinda what i was anticipating... is it common to be able to beat ft for 1bb/100 more?