#1
|
|||
|
|||
BBV: Betting the NFL
BRAG: GAMBLING IS FUN
BEAT: Losing sometimes Variance: The NFL is CCRAAZZYYY and bets are hard to pinpoint Games are wiley this weekend, my underdog card is as follows: Pittsburgh @ Cincinnati Cincinatti EDIT: Replaced Detroit @ Chicago Detroit Jacksonville @ Tampa Bay Jacksonville Buffalo @ NY Jets Buffalo Green Bay @ Denver Green Bay. Are all those gonna hit? Like 95% no. But if they do, big money's a comin. What are your bets for the games this weekend BEE BEE VEE? (I know my posts have been sucking lately, just answer the damn question.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
Games are wiley this weekend, my underdog card is as follows: Pittsburgh @ Cincinnati Cincinatti [/ QUOTE ] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
how is buffalo an underdog?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
they had dallas beat up until the final second, and they just beat baltimore fwiw.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
[censored] hell, i know we suck, but we're not losing to the [censored] bills again
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
i think those picks are ok bmwguy, good luck [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
Ill bet doubleTOMs BR on the lions.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
i think i pick the opposite team as you in all of those games
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] hell, i know we suck, but we're not losing to the [censored] bills again [/ QUOTE ] well they are the biggest disappointment in the league at this point |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
BRAG: GAMBLING IS FUN BEAT: Losing sometimes Variance: The NFL is CCRAAZZYYY and bets are hard to pinpoint Games are wiley this weekend, my underdog card is as follows: Pittsburgh @ Cincinnati Cincinatti [/ QUOTE ] I would reconsider this |
|
|