Party 5/10 vs 2/4 and 3/6

[aamitch10]

So I don't post here very often, but would like to start a discussion. I find that the party 5/10 is by far the easiest game to beat (high only). Next is the 2/4, then the 3/6. I know I am a fairly tight player so this is really no suprise, but over 15000 hands logged and 5/10 is by far my largest money maker. I am at 4.57 bb/100 in the 5/10. In the 2/4 I am 2.20 BB/100 and in the 3/6 I am only 1.05 BB/500. And Every time I play 2/4 or 3/6 I find it a more difficult game than 5/10. Is this just variance as I only have 15,000 hands logged, or do you agree that the 5/10 is easier?

Thanks,

[Andy B]

Sounds like maybe you should just play $5/10 until you have a good reason not to.

[ACPlayer]

One reason maybe the relatively high ante/bring=in.

Of course, you also dont have enough data.

[Natethegreek]

a very small amount could be contributed to less % in rake as well.

[BeerMoney]

I don't like the 2.4 structure at all. I think the players at 5.10 are far better than 3.6 though.

You're probably running hot at 5.10.

[jon_1van]

Do you make any playing adjust ments from level to level?

Your 5/10 winrate versus your 3/6 winrate is a bit strange.

You kill the 5/10 but just survive the 3/6....doesn't make sense.

Either you have a strange sample or you don't adjust your play nearly enough from structure to structure

[greatwhite]

Although I haven't played much 5-10 I actually find the 10-20 to be easier than the 5-10. I would also say that the 15-30 is just as bad as the 10-20.

[aamitch10]

Thanks for the input everyone. After re-thinking everything I have come to the conclusion that the structure at 5/10 fits me much better. I also don't adjust properly to the higher ante of the 3/6. I believe 15000 hands is a pretty small sample and really expect to see my winrate drop in the 5/10 and come up slightly in the 2/4. I will re-evaluate after 10-15000 more hands.