#1
|
|||
|
|||
Taking gambits to a new level...
http://skaksamband.is/index.php?opti...amp;Itemid=351
Check out game 4 from that link (Ingvar vs. Snorri). At first I thought white was completely and utterly retarded, but as the game unfolded, well... What do you guys think of white's play here? Any countermoves? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Taking gambits to a new level...
that's pretty sweet, was it already known?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Taking gambits to a new level...
10. Qf3!? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Taking gambits to a new level...
that is pretty awesome....a lot more sophisticated than it initially seemed.
my only real question is- why is white so keen to settle for a draw? jon |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Taking gambits to a new level...
In what position? Even if he plays g4+ and takes back the queen he is still down 2 rooks.
This is why a line like this is not a significant novelty, though. It doesn't improve the evaluation of the position for White unless someone can find an improvement at some stage. It will end up as a line strong players have to be aware of in open tournaments when their opponents are happy to draw as white, and a gimmick that is used when both players agree to draw in advance. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Taking gambits to a new level...
well i think 8. e5 is far from the best option for white. i think 9. Bb5+ isn't so hot either. this seems like the "let's see how bad we can [censored] things up without actually losing" line.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|