[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I see your point, we just disagree how to get there. Here is a good article that discusses the money flowing in to nanotech.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...UG7IDL1AF1.DTL
[/ QUOTE ]
well maybe the better expression of my point was that if mmgw was true and the dangers true then nuke plants would be being planned and built right now.
also the article I quick added up he money it's less than 0.25 billion. US spent what, 4000 billion on iraq war so far?
[/ QUOTE ]
I guess where we disagree is if the US spent $4 trillion on nanotech solar would it be commercially viable sooner and would the benifits of earlier development outweigh the cost? I just don't think the Governemnt throwing money at a problem is going to solve it. I support the Iraq War, but others may argue the $4 trillion spent has not solved the problem.