[bkholdem]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Concisely? Not really. Aesthetic/virtue driven, I don't think others should adhere to it per se. Best I can do as far as concise go.

[/ QUOTE ]

So how does this conflict with libertarian morals?

You do what you want (which is adhere to your moral code) and do not interfere with others doing what they want (which may be adhering to the same code or other things- and you don't think others should adhere to yours per se).

I don't see where the problem is. Please explain.

[/ QUOTE ]

When did I say I didn't interfere with others?

The problem as I stated is that libertarian morality (unless you could somehow insure every single person had it) wouldn't really contribute to a world state in which AC was realistic.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you are virtuous and like to forcibly interfere with others who are doing you or others no harm, but you see other systems where people do not forcibly interfere with each other or harm each other as inferior?

If this is true, sounds like you would be one of the people with guns trying to take over....