Re: College Coaches in the Hot Seat
If I were in charge:
#1 Bye bye wannstedt. Coaches terribly. Seen no signs of recruits developing.
#2 Carr is really awful and should've been fired years ago. Hell, he never should've been hired. It's easy to have Michigan #2 in the Big11Ten every year. That shouldn't be an accomplishment the administration is happy with achieving.
#3 Goodbye Nutt. Chased away the offensive genius hired to get recruits. Personal issues. Too combatative.
#4 Franchione is out of here--non-competitive losses are too tough to swallow.
Robinson deserves to go, but it's tough to only give a coach 3 years. He better impress next season.
Orgeron deserves another year or two. Let's see how he does with 4 full years of his recruits. It won't help the program to go another direction.
I give Mike Stoops one more year since he did recognize and overhaul his offense. Let's see if it can come together next year.
Ty--laughable he's on the list--I'm guessing they beat Hawai'i too.
Bowden and FSU are nowhere near as bad as some would have you believe. They've been as good as Notre Lame the last 3 years, but haven't had that over-rated schedule.
Guy Morriss is good. Baylor just shouldn't have football.
Callahan-Cosgrove-Childress trifecta
well the trio succeeded at Illinois under White in the early 80s by raiding California JUCOs for thugs. They succeeded at Wisconsin in the early 90s by raiding gang-bangers where other schools backed away. My question is: Does Callahan have a place to raid in the current environment? Given the #5, #20, and #13 recruiting classes locked up the previous 3 years and a current top10 standing, I have to give this set of coaches the 5 years to put things in place.
My main philosophy is that every coach deserves 5 years. That's how long the whole turnover takes for it to be his regime. Only in extreme cases should that be violated. I wonder how Ty at ND or Zook at Florida would've done if they got their whole 5 years.
|