[Split Suit]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's very good

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
all it does is ruin play

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't tell by your post whether you are pro-SS or anti-SSers.

FWIW, I don't really know if I'm for it or against it. But I do know short-stackers mostly cut into my bottom-line. Even when they aren't very good, they cause me and the other players to have to tighten up.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've participated in ratholing. I don't know what the big deal is really. At night games tho, it seems pretty profitable since you get those folks calling with AT and so forth.

At any rate, the ratholers do one good thing anyway. They make my winrate wih 85o in LP or sb go up.

However, I agree with the movement. I'd love to see all the games have a minimum buy in of 50x and a max of 200x

[/ QUOTE ]

i rly dont think u want a 50min-200max game (bb-wise). i think this wud kill off fish too quickly. there are caps on games for a reason, and thats to keep the poker ecosystem in tact. i think 100bb is real poker enuff, and maintains the poker ecosystem for quite awhile.

arguments can b made either way, im just sayyin

i wud like if some tables were 200bb deep tho. i used to make a killing playyin deep. (20ptBB/100 over a dec sample).