View Single Post
  #18  
Old 08-21-2006, 12:42 AM
VORP VORP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 599
Default Re: Pot awarded after defective deck found

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Mike Matt's told me about this incident this afternoon

[/ QUOTE ]

Say what? I thought he was at MGM. How does he know about this incident?

But for me, I'm happy to close it and let it lie. Bally's rule book and Robert's Rules both seem to support that you let stand the results of playing with a 51-card deck. I got bad beaten for a $500 pot by a 2 out of 45 outter instead of what would have been a 2 out of 46er. Not a problem long as the rules also state that this is the case.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yea, I work with him at MGM (or did, today was my last day). Word can travel around town pretty fast at times. I've heard about a number of incidents from people at work and then seen the a thread show up here on it a day or two later.

Randy: I could be wrong but I had thought that the gaming regulations in NV stated that any fouled deck nullified the hand, without exception. I don't know where I could double check that, but it's what I've been told in the past.
Reply With Quote