Re: Pot awarded after defective deck found
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now I do find it odd that the high-hand jackpot payouts are not made if a deck is found to have 51 cards. That *IS* in the rules (I saw that one). Seems like either the deck is good enough and the hand plays, or the deck is bad and the hand doesn't play. It shouldn't be good enough to award the pot, but bad enough to skip the high-hand award.
[/ QUOTE ]
Everyone contesting for the pot was playing with the same 51 card deck. Assuming the high hand award is a progressive amount the players competing for that were not playing with the same deck.
[/ QUOTE ]
Also you no longer have concern that a player might intentionally foul the deck to freerol as you mention in another post.
|