[VP$IP]

Short version:
You can't. He can see your cards. You can't see his.

Long version:
You can't. He can see your cards. You can't see his.

He has access to the online casino. You don't.

If the superuser is "caught" you might get your money back (but not what you might have won). If he is not caught (which is much more likely) he keeps your money. Does that sound like a good deal?

The superuser can use multiple throwaway accounts with no special privileges to do the betting, while the superuser only observes and advises the "aggressive lucky player" via telephone or instant messaging via another computer. The "aggressive lucky player" can later "lose" the winnings in another game to a legitimate "mule account" for cashing out.

The superuser has the greatest gain from tournaments, where the payouts are very large, where the individual loss per opponent is not large, and where aggressive play is not uncommon.

The Absolute Poker cheating conspiracy could certainly have survived the storm if the spreadsheet containing everyone's cards, IP addresses, observers, etc. had not been inadvertently released. They may survive the storm anyway.

Superuser activity was also observed in high stakes HU play, but there was no "full data" leak to confirm it to everyone's satisfaction. If you played against one of the "known" cheating accounts, during the time period of the admitted "security breach", you may get your money back. If you lost to one of the unknown alias accounts, you will not.

If you play at a cheating online casino in order to take advantage of the suckers, remember this. If you can't spot the sucker in five minutes, it is you. If you can spot the sucker in five minutes, it is still you.