View Single Post
  #29  
Old 10-15-2007, 07:51 PM
CaptainFreedom CaptainFreedom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 113
Default Re: Who was more deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize? Pearson Vs Gore

Krugman had a funny article about deadenders and Gore.

"Gore Derangement Syndrome


On the day after Al Gore shared the Nobel Peace Prize, The Wall Street Journal’s editors couldn’t even bring themselves to mention Mr. Gore’s name. Instead, they devoted their editorial to a long list of people they thought deserved the prize more.

And at National Review Online, Iain Murray suggested that the prize should have been shared with “that well-known peace campaigner Osama bin Laden, who implicitly endorsed Gore’s stance.” You see, bin Laden once said something about climate change — therefore, anyone who talks about climate change is a friend of the terrorists.

.....What is it about Mr. Gore that drives right-wingers insane?


....The worst thing about Mr. Gore, from the conservative point of view, is that he keeps being right. In 1992, George H. W. Bush mocked him as the “ozone man,” but three years later the scientists who discovered the threat to the ozone layer won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. In 2002 he warned that if we invaded Iraq, “the resulting chaos could easily pose a far greater danger to the United States than we presently face from Saddam.” And so it has proved. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/op...mp;oref=slogin
Reply With Quote