[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So research is legit just only research from the 30's. Excellent.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all. We must also give great weight to any contemporary research supporting his position, because it bucks the trend and is therefore credible.

Similarly, we must acknowledge that creation scientists are much more likely to be correct than ordinary scientists - they're the ones who have the courage to go against the majority. It hardly matters that most scientists accept evolution - there's so much pressure in academia to accept evolution, how could they not? But even with all that pressure, some brave souls choose to seek the truth instead of worshipping political correctness.

And my friends - they should be applauded. They should be applauded.

[/ QUOTE ]

And accordingly, we must relax our standards when it comes to peer review and legitimate publication, verification and replication of results. I mean, obviously none of the biased journals (all of them LDO) would publish anything contradictory. And no one is going to replicate the experiments at the risk of their careers, or possibly just due to a crippling fear of uncovering the truth.