[pokercurious]

[ QUOTE ]
but do we really expect a bad player to three-bet re-bluff for all the money?

[/ QUOTE ]
Maybe. However, we definitely expect him to 3bet with what he thinks is the nuts (more accurate is probably what he thinks beats us):

Does villain ever do this with KT? With AK? With KQ? With KJ? With K7? With AA (so many villains can never get away from this, and this is exactly how a lot of them play it)?

OP said villain is a bad player. If so, the answer to many of these questions is 'yes', and therefore there are many hands worse than OP's full house that shove, making this an easy call.

bbbushu, not really sure what you're looking for. This seems to be about as clear cut as it gets in terms of hand ranges and hand reading - we're not trying to put him on an exact hand, just correlate his behavior to the most likely range, which we destroy. I have to agree with daveT on the LC thing.

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I don't really see how this is anything but a snap call. Folding if there's any chance he does this with a 5 or wores is a disaster. This could just as easily be KT or K7 as KK, TT, 77 as IME players who slow play one on the flop will slowplay them all.

[x]You're getting great odds
[x]Opponent is an unknown donk who likely thinks you're tilted
[x]You have a runner runner boat
[x]Fistpump

[/ QUOTE ]

QFMFT