Re: Should the PPA accept membership/backing from bot providers/users?
Again i am going to advance my opinion that both Bluff and Legislurker have another agenda at work besides just wanting US online poker.
Both are entirely too vitrolic in their opposition to the PPA. I am pretty sure they feel they have something to lose with passage of something akin to the Wexler Bill.
By contrast, Mason, who seems to have quite a bit of trouble with the PPA too, generally says his piece and lets it go.
Bluff and Legislurker are probably associated with some sort of business entities that would be hurt by PPA success. whether those be competing affiliates, some offshore sites, or whatever.
I say if they look like a duck, walk like a duck, quack like a duck, and generally behave like ducks, then they are most likely ducks, whatever they might claim otherwise.
Just my personal take.
Tuff
|