[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You as an ACist should understand why I am not in the business of answering questions (and spending time on things) that are designed to obscure institutionalized violence and further the illusion of choice.
[/ QUOTE ]
No one has asked
you anything about the state, they want to know what types of models you think private arbitration in an AC world would look like. Would they be similar to those today? Radically different somehow?
My problem with your posts is that they don't further dialogue any. You're not going to change any minds by simply repeating "institutionalized violent monopoly theft!!!" ad nauseam. It's ok to give your opinion on how you think things might work. If you don't know or don't have an opinion, then you don't need to say anything.
So do you have any thoughts on what arbitration might look like in a free society?
[/ QUOTE ]
No:
http://www.perbylund.com/the_library...anarchists.htm
But you've casually ignored the issue of dominance. Do you recognize that behaviour in your post(s) in this thread towards me?
[/ QUOTE ]
If you have no thoughts on the topic in this thread, why did you even bother to post in it?
And my attitude was one of annoyance, not dominance. I don't want dominate anyone.