Re: Social Darwinism and Morals
Well, he seemed to value philosophical and rational thinking very highly, and see himself as part of an elite group that thinks deeply and is intelligent, while also being "strong-minded" and having master morality, so I'd assume he would be willing to re-evaluate his "synthesis", if it would be questioned with good arguing instead of just ridiculing. I don't think he considered himself supernatural or anything. Anyone clearly outside of that group would have no value.
|