View Single Post
  #54  
Old 10-10-2007, 08:43 PM
shamus shamus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Personville
Posts: 27
Default Re: Child\'s QQ -v- Yang\'s JJ

Childs actually did not have Yang covered when this hand -- Hand No. 9 -- began. After Hand No. 8, Yang had around 14 mil & Childs 13.3 mil. ESPN was wrong/misleading last night here. McEachern says “this would be for almost all of Lee Childs’s chips,” but in fact, it would have been for all his chips.

Here is Poker News' report -- click the "Show This Hand" feature for chip stacks prior to beg. of hand.
Reply With Quote