[Thug Bubbles]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They dropped the rape charge because the video clearly showed her consenting.

[/ QUOTE ]

So RedBean was way wrong and conveniently screwing up facts to support an indefensible position!? Noooo! That's not the Beaner I know!

[/ QUOTE ]

This is kinda funny considering that they didn't drop the rape charge.

You just can't buy this kind of irony anymore.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I took Thug's information on face value, since up until then neither of you had provided any actual information and your track record is not very good.

As it stands, I am not sure who is right and also don't care, because like I said: It's irrelevant and courts should be making correct decisions as they apply to the case in front of them.

You should look up the definition of irony if you think this qualifies. But, vocabulary is probably the least of your problems, so actually you should do a lot of other things first.

[/ QUOTE ]

My bad. I coulda swore they dropped it. Lemmie find out what I screwed up.

EDIT:

The video showed that the sex was consensual, but the rape charge stayed. That t'was my confusion. Either way, RedBean was wrong in that aspect.

[ QUOTE ]
I couldn't figure out how he got off on the rape count when the video shows him screwing a girl while shes practically knocked out unconscious and unable to consent.

[/ QUOTE ]

EDIT 2:

WTF??? (from Wikipedia)

[ QUOTE ]
Reacting to District Attorney David McDade's releasing the videotape to legislators, media and the general public upon request, Georgia State Sen. Emanuel Jones said he would introduce legislation to block district attorneys from handing over photographic images in sex cases. "'I'm going to call it the David McDade Act,' Jones said. 'Sometimes we have to protect our kids from district attorneys.'" [12] Because the participants shown having sex in the video were under 18, the videotape constitutes child pornography under federal law. The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act prohibits prosecutors from allowing defendants in criminal proceedings to possess a copy of any evidence that constitutes child pornography, even if the purpose is to mount a defense against the charge. Under this law, Wilson and his defense team are prohibited from having a copy of the videotape that prosecutor McDade has distributed to anyone else who has requested it. [13]

[/ QUOTE ]