[Mempho]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So, he says that a Latin American currency is far in the future. He says he and Bush proposed the FTAA. He says Chavez is anti-FTAA. When asked if there would be an analogue of the Euro, he says that would be a long, long term thing. He says the first step towards economic integration is free trade agreements, and then later, maybe more.

Things he does not say: "Yes, there will be an amero."

[/ QUOTE ]

so let me get this straight, US and mexico admit they are working towards an amero currency, they admit it, but people who oppose it, who say, no, this is bad policy, those people are called conspiracy theorists and not allowed to participate in what is obviously a political question.

do you see the doublethink?

[/ QUOTE ]

People who postulate a conspiracy to introduce the amero without discussion at some point in the near future are conspiracy theorists. The hypothetical people who are opposed to the amero without making up conspiracies are not conspiracy theorists. (Wrong, but not conspiracy theorists)

[/ QUOTE ]

I certainly don't think that it will just show up one day by surprise. I think that it will become a part of the public dialogue for some time and a number of pundits will tell us just why we need it. Knowing something that contradicts popular opinion, however, often gets one labeled as a conspiracy theorist.