[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Are there property rights in the sort of anarchism that Chomsky describes?
[/ QUOTE ]
Nope. In fact, individual rights aren't recognized at all, and you would be just a drone in the Borg.
The closest example of the practical manifestation of Chomsky's political "philosophy" is the former
Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia in the late 1970's -- which Chomsky, not surprisingly, supported.
[/ QUOTE ]
Individual rights are at the essence of Chosmsky's phillosophy.
[/ QUOTE ]
Only if you define "rights" in the collectivist,
Arbeit macht frei sort of way.
[ QUOTE ]
Again you are confused with the authorianism of state socialism to which Chomsky rejects.
[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not "confused" at all. Yes, Chomsky and his comrades package their political propaganda using a different flavor of rhetoric than that of state socialism, but it's a road which leads to the same place. It's a difference of style, not substance.
[ QUOTE ]
Jesus, go away. Everyone here is well equipped at doing google searches and can realise for themselves that Chosmy did not support the Cambodian genocide- or deny it.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't see how this article by Chomsky can be interpreted to be anything other than tacitly supporting the Khmer Rouge and explicitly denying the genocide.
Distortions at Fourth Hand