Re: management argue
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the correct min raise would be to 1600 (700 + 700 + 200)
[/ QUOTE ]
Wow. Bold and screaming -- and you are really bad at this. When was there ever a 700 raise to set that as the amount of the min-raise?
[/ QUOTE ]
moron.... it's not, when was there a raise to 700?, it's, what is the action to the player in question? (a raise of 700) please somehow try to manage to get your mind out of the limit gutter
[/ QUOTE ]
Well this moron is telling you (also a moron, possibly?) that you are absolutely wrong. The question is indeed "When was there a raise to 700?" The answer (i.e., "never") makes your answer incorrect.
It is 200 (BB) +600 (Raise) +100 (additional all-in) to the next raiser. The raise is determined by the size of the previous bet or raise in the round NOT by the total action of all previous bets or raises in the round. If the middle player did not go all-in, but made a min-raise of an additional 600, the next min-raise would still be 600 (and a very silly bet).
The question turns on whether the next raise -- which is clearly 600 minimum -- is on top of the current bet-to-call(1500) or do we ignore the all-in (1400). 1600 is not in the conversation.
|