[ImBetterAtGolf]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I guess I wasn't being clear. The thinly veiled fund does sound like GSAM, but it is attributing actions to them that they didn't do. That is, the guys who wrote the story aren't that familiar with what really happened and what specific participants did.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you are forming your opinion on the validity of this article by assuming they are referring to a specific fund which you know didn't perform certain actions yet you aren't really sure what fund the article referenced in the first place?

Got it.

Jimbo

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm forming my opinion based on my knowledge of what actually happened. Got it?