Re: 2+2 and Editing: Oh, the Irony
Nate,
I haven't read through all the posts in this thread, but let me just say amen. As graduate student in creative writing, I find some of the errors in 2+2 books untenable. While they are great books, HEFAP, TOP, and Stox's new book all have editing/style flaws. The technical nature of the texts requires more clarity, not less. Let’s face it, some of the concepts in these books are complex, and their editing further detracts from their lucidity.
|