[noncents]

[ QUOTE ]

“First and foremost, we would like to assure our players, once again, that the security
breach, which resulted in unfair play, was resolved immediately after it was discovered
and confirmed, and AP’s sites are absolutely secure.


[/ QUOTE ]

Still laugh at AP`s definition of immediately.

[ QUOTE ]

• “The system breach was the result of a recent internal software release impacting
internal reporting. The breach was exploitable only by an authorized AP person
that manipulated the internal reporting software, together with the AP gaming
software. The security breach was not, therefore, the result of an external action,
and no individual outside AP could exploit the breach.
• “There is no evidence of the current or past existence of a “super-user” account.
There is no player account in the AP system with the ability to see other players’
hole cards.


[/ QUOTE ]

I guess there's no benifit to them in denying the superuser account but how does this make sense in light of the two potripper tournament folds prior to user 363 arriving?