[Shoe]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
us limit boys don't mind.

[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] stars

[/ QUOTE ]


yes we do.

The disparity between full-ring and 6-max is also relevant on the limit tables.

I am playing quite a bit of limit on Stars these days. But I would actually be playing even more than I do already if they would fix this discrepency in which 6-max players pay significantly more rake for the FPP's they earn.

[/ QUOTE ]

I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Stars too, but I wish they would simply go so far as to award an additional .5 VPP at $2 rake and the other .5 VPP at $3 rake, as opposed to the current nothing extra at $2 rake and 1 whole VPP at $3 rake.

Lots of the time playing 6 max there are less than 6 people at the table, so when you pay more than $1 rake, you aren't getting anything in return (I am in no way suggesting they should still take $3 rake with less than 6 players, just that the current reward scheme benefits 10 max much more than 6 max).