Re: quick question
[ QUOTE ]
You also want them to pay off, though. Deep stacks in the hands of a careful player don't make for such big implied odds.
I suppose set-over-set is a bit of a concern with 22 and VERY deep stacks. PNLHE is the first acknowledgment I've seen in print that bottom set could start to have a IO problem. I don't think it matters unless the stacks are incredibly deep, though.
[/ QUOTE ]
i agree. w/normal stack sizes you'd have to be against the king of the nits or have a sick read to fold a set in fear of a higher set
|