View Single Post
  #791  
Old 10-22-2007, 05:20 PM
waveydavey waveydavey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 57
Default Re: AP thread 872.6 - Statement ITT

[ QUOTE ]
What about rakeback affiliates? I took AP and UB off my rakeback site but i'm not sure it's the correct decision.

If a client wants to play at AP knowing what has happened, who am I to tell them they can't?

Tuco.

[/ QUOTE ]
You can tell them that you don't think they should play there. It's a valid opinion. And you can choose not to list them on your site if you feel that's the right thing to do.

It's all about personal choices, yours for your reasons, and other players who may or may not continue to play at AP or UB for their own reasons.

Personally I think player boycotts, or attacking each other, are pointless exercises. I believe that the only way AP will get punished in any realistic way is if the appropriate authorities get involved. That will come about by players coming up with the evidence, (as they have), and handing it over to the authorities, who actually have the power to press criminal charges. I can't help but think this would be so much easier for Nat et. al. if the PPA would support them.