Re: Razz past and present
[ QUOTE ]
As for the mistake in SOR, I noticed it too, but always assumed the experts in this particular forum had already had the discussion several times over. I could have sworn I saw this mentioned in Books/Publications but I might be thinking of another internet poker forum that I used to frequent.
[/ QUOTE ]
2+2 books are a bit famous for typos and small errors, but one of the things Mason is very proud of is that 2+2 books concepts are always correct. In the case of this error its a mathematical typo, but the playing concept is still valid and shouldn't change how you play. I asked SGspecial to ask David about it in the Sklansky Special Forum, I don't think he has yet. I could explain why, but I really think David should jump in to explain rather than me because its his typo/error - I'm pretty sure he would be happy to discuss.
|