[jmillerdls]

[ QUOTE ]
Personally, I excel at satellite structures and many people play them very poorly. For that reason, and the fact that they'd take less time to complete, I like #3.

#2 would be a very good plan for anyone that get's a high % of 1sts, but they wouldn't be very popular.

#1 would have a much lower $/hr rate, and I don't think the reduced variance would make up for that.


zip

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with your assessment of all of them. I think that fish could be attracted to each one, but definately #3 would be ideal for most people here. I'd love to see it implemented, although it's probably unlikely.

The tournies would end very fast, and give PS some more rake/hr, so it could make sense for them also.

I just played my first satellite MTT today (to the Sunday million), and happened to make it with very little effort, and it is mostly the reason I thought of this thread. #3 resembles a satellite, which seem to have a high profitablity expectation for players who adjust correctly.