Re: confused with the reason for the post ?
My point is that once something is reduced to math, arguments become moot. The math shows conclusivly what answers are right and what answers are wrong. (And yes, I understand that you can have some equations with more than one right answer because the solution is a range. But possible solutions outside that range are still wrong.)
Dave's whole talent is his ability to grasp the basic math and logic that underpin poker issues. Say what you want about his ability to execute at the table, but his fundamental understanding of the game is unassailable.
|