[jstill]

getting it in with QQ vs most players 4 betting range is not a great thing with full stacks

thats the unfortunate thing alot of 30+/20+ have the same 4 betting range as many 15/10 guys but its so much more tempting to call the 30/20, even though all that really matters here is villains 4 betting range not his overall stats.

I think if the limper folded this is a definite fold unless u have some reason to believe this player 4bets AK JJ, without some evidence hes capable of spewing or thinks he can move u off any hand any time id fold. With the limper its tougher. QQ is gonna be the tweener for me here (JJ I wouldnt give much thought to doing anything besides folding) and it depends on our recent dynamic perhaps to push the decision for me, Id probably play it safe and muck assuming the limpers not gonna stack off behind with TT or AQ AK or whatever.

I think ur 3bet is alittle too small OOP esp with the limpers added dead money tho tbh. Id go like 110-120 probably ( a Pot size raise would be 120ish and OOP u'd much rather raise more than that rather than less) and then fold if the limper folded and button shoved (unless I had a read he could 4 bet light) and call if the limper called and I thought villain could 4bet worse hands sometimes and the limper would stack off with JJ AK behind. Without reads I tend to err on the side of caution in these spots so far in my NL career. QQ just doesnt play great vs most players 4 betting range from what I've seen at star's NL100, though I cant speak to limits higher than NL200 (I assume this was NL400 correct?).