Re: Sit \'N Go strategy-reviews?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They're sulking because they weren't consulted. Given the level of analysis most of the rated players indulge in, I'm not very surprised.
[/ QUOTE ]
Lol. If you think that the top sng players weren't consulted because of the strategy advice in STTF, then you are very disillusioned.
[/ QUOTE ]
Dude, if their level of reading comprehension matches yours, I'd not be disillusioned at all. I say "analysis", you read "advice". The advice might be ultrasound but if it comes without analysis, it's not so valuable. Do you not see that?
[/ QUOTE ]
Oh gee, amazing I misunderstood you. When you said 'level', you meant 'quantity' and not 'quality'. Wait, what does level mean again 'quantity' or 'quality'?
Anyway, what I read of your statement is a critique on their quality (level) of analysis. Which, can only really be critiqued if it exists. So, maybe my reading comprehension isn't so bad? Maybe your point wasn't so clear?
Maybe if you want to talk about the lack of analysis. You could use words like 'lacking', 'absence', etc.
|