[moorbr02]

the only reason, the dealers action or the floor decision were questioned, is because jc lost the hand. jc said nothing when the dealer turned the cards up. he said nothing, in fact he watched like it was business as usual as the dealer burned and turned the turn card and said nothing as he burned and turned the river card. he only got upset and blamed his loss on dealer error when he was ran down. the hand didn't touch the muck, the muck was on the other side of the dealer. the hand was retrievable and properly exposed, per tda rules. and how could any floor person rule otherwise? he got the story, the player was all in, he threw his cards across the table, the dealer exposed them as the rules state, the turn and river were dealt, his hand was the best hand. how do you gather those facts and tell him he's out of the tournament?