[futuredoc85]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do you even know what amoral means? It means having no morality at all.

That is to say very few educated people believe that retardations from birth have any sort of good/evil associated with them.

That is to say, when a person is born with no arms, they are retarded, but they are not evil because they have no arms.

[/ QUOTE ]

Point taken. I assumed that because of the utter redundancy of the qualifier 'amoral' you were misusing the word.

Egg on our face.

Somebody quote this too.

[/ QUOTE ]

i understood what you meant once you explained it, but my point that it's moronic still stands. The only argument supporting any form of retardation would be that it inhibits breeding, which is false b/c while it may inhibit there desire for recreational intercourse w/ women, they are still perfectly capable of breeding.