[jeffnc]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As long as our opponent isn't doing something weird with, like, a pair of aces, there isn't a single hand we beat that he should be raising this river with given his previous action.

[/ QUOTE ]

But you are completely discounting the possibility that he's doing something "tricky", or "fun". Or, as Mike Caro has pointed out, there is a certain amount of randomness to ALL players, and ALL players occasionally do something more or less on a whim.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't "completely discount" anything. The very passage you quote shows me mentioning the possibility that he's doing something on a whim. That's the opposite of discounting.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're completely discounting any hand other than aces.

Now, if you're going to claim that you didn't mean that because you said "like", then your statement is completely pointless. It boils down to "there isn't a single hand we beat, except for all the ones we beat." I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't say something so inane.