View Single Post
  #16  
Old 07-21-2007, 01:27 PM
Jeffmet3 Jeffmet3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FTP Chat Banned
Posts: 1,146
Default Re: Would a mutual fund manager to better with $1 billion or $100 mill

[ QUOTE ]
But dont they normally divide those big funds into a bunch of managers with like $300 mill each.

I know a good friend of my dads who I normally play golf with works as a fund manager for ubs bank, and he runs $300 mill. Just wondering...

[/ QUOTE ]

some do, some don't. I'm pretty sure most fund families don't do this though.

By dividing it up, to say 7 different sectors, with each getting a % to manage, you solve 2 problems:

1) Each can specialize and delve into their own sector

2) and possibly more important:

the stability of the fund is not just dependent on 1 person leading it. That way, even if one 1 person leaves, the fund should continue to do great. Versus, for funds where 1 manager has been there for 20+ years of prosperity, it's somewhat unknown how the new manager will do.

At the same time, there's something to be said for having 1 person set the vision and direction of the fund, rather than a few competing.
Reply With Quote