View Single Post
  #70  
Old 11-07-2007, 03:55 PM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: Longshot Theoretical Question: Paul v Hillary

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because the reasons he's "different" is because he actually follows the Constitution like he swore an oath to do. Every other member of Congress isn't interested in following their oath.


[/ QUOTE ]

Or their interpretation of the Constitution is different than yours?

[/ QUOTE ]

The Constitution is simple and straightforward and the evidence for what Original Intent was is overwhelming. Other "interpretations" are based entirely on manipulating the law to get it to say what the politicians want it to do instead of what it actually says.
Reply With Quote