View Single Post
  #63  
Old 11-07-2007, 01:54 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Intrepidly Reporting
Posts: 14,174
Default Re: Longshot Theoretical Question: Paul v Hillary

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And where does "I won't vote for a guy that wants to let states criminalize gay sex again" magically transform into Democrats lacking integrity?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm, thanks for making my point. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow.

edit: I guess I should actually make it clearer, so here you go: you're entitled to think that the Constitution does not contain a right to privacy (and a bunch of other rights Ron Paul doesn't believe in, either.) You are *not* entitled to think that there is no debate about it and that the other side is lacking integrity. That is, you might think that, but if that's how you're going to attract recruits to your cause, 1)you are acting no differently than Fox News, and 2)good luck with appealing to the vast majority of the country.
Reply With Quote