Re: New Supreme Court Term
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Whether explicit images created without using actual children can be prosecuted as child pornography.
[/ QUOTE ]
lol. Most open and shut one imo.
[/ QUOTE ]
I have no idea which way you think it'll go.
[/ QUOTE ]
It's well-settled that the government can't punish the possession of pornography that contains what "appears to be" child pornography, even if it isn't. I checked, and the case this term distinguishes itself by addressing a law that punishes the pandering of such "looks like but isn't" material. As I mentioned above, it's semantics, but you never know.
|